“Joseph Straus [4] outlines three models to explain the motivation behind the practice of musical quotation. The first, “influence of immaturity,” refers to borrowing as a necessity, common in the youthful phase prior to developing a personal musical style. The second, “influence of generosity,” is a more mature and subtle exteriorization through art of enriching artistic influences and may be also found in the artist’s late works. “
Juan Carlos Vasquez (composer, sound artist, researcher), McIntire Department of Music, University of Virginia, 112 Old Cabell Hall, P.O. Box 400176, Charlottesville, VA 22904, U.S.A. Email: jcv3qj@virginia.edu. Web: www.jcvasquez.com. See www.mitpressjournals.org/toc/lmj/29 for supplemental files associated with this issue. 88 LEONARDO MUSIC JOURNAL, Vol. 29, pp. 88–92, 2019 In the third theory, “influence of anxiety”—mostly applied to music in the twentieth century—the interrelation of original and borrowed ideas (the new and the old) are presented in conflict, crucially defining the work.

“Collage 1 (1961) by James Tenney is a noteworthy case given the specific application of appropriation of popular culture in the tape music genre. Collage 1 uses fragments of Elvis Presley’s cover of Blue Suede Shoes by Carl Perkins. It is composed by reshuffling and rearranging the original piece with playbacks at different speeds. Brian Eno remarked that Tenney provided us with the chance to hear everyday music differently while “all that was inherently Elvis radically influenced our perception of Jim’s piece” [18]. This goes in line with existing research that indicates that the recognition of borrowed material in an appropriated work has a significant impact on the general perception of the work that served as a source [19].”
in relation to questions of bringing something traditional into a contemporary space such as a sound installation, questions of appropriation may arise – what does it mean to take a practice that has been performed one way for vast periods and recontextualise it into an installation setting? what does it mean to take away the performers and replace them with speakers? What does the amalgamation of traditional elements with contemporary elements form ideologically? and more importantly, what does it mean for me and a person of my identity to formulate the ideas for this installation. Ever since i began making spatialised pieces I had always wanted to implement my background and identity into in some way.
•“It occurred to me that we always bring our identities and our experiences of “where we come from” to bear in the places where we meet. Later, I would think of place as this dynamic network of situated identities”
•Ouzounian, G. (2008). Sound Art and Spatial Practices: Situating Sound Installation Art Since 1958. [online] University of California, San Diego. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/7166588/Sound_Art_and_Spatial_Practices_Situating_Sound_Installation_Art_Since_1958 [Accessed 7 May 2024].
I believe the projection of my piece is as complicated as my own identity. an individual who is of diasporic origin, who has a background in listening to Qawwali (and making audio documentaries on it), an individual with a Muslim background but also a musical background, where technology is a huge part of my life and the production of my music. The piece becomes an expression of both my traditional elements and my technological entrenchment. With the recognition of borrowed elements in my work, the general perception of the traditional elements is highlighted which I don’t know how to really feel about.
does it become a form of commercialisation? Have I made something that is simply voyeuristic consumption to the average listener?